Removal of 17α-ethinylestradiol and total phosphorus in a sequencing batch reactor under two different sludge retention-time conditions

  • Lícia Murito de Paula Departamento de Saneamento e Saúde Ambiental. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, n° 1480, CEP: 21041-210, Manguinhos, RJ, Brazil
  • Eline Simões Gonçalves Instituto de Química. Departamento de Geoquímica Ambiental. Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Outeiro São João Batista, s/n, CEP: 24020-141, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
  • Larissa Coelho Auto Gomes Departamento de Saneamento e Saúde Ambiental. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, n° 1480, CEP: 21041-210, Manguinhos, RJ, Brazil.
  • José Carlos Rodrigues de Moura Júnior Departamento de Engenharia Química e de Materiais. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rua Marquês de São Vicente, n° 124, CEP: 22451-040, Gávea, RJ, Brazil.
  • Jaime Lopes da Mota Oliveira Departamento de Saneamento e Saúde Ambiental. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, n° 1480, CEP: 21041-210, Manguinhos, RJ, Brazil.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2898

Abstract

Sewage treatment systems can prevent the direct discharge of endocrine disruptors, such as 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), into the environment. Treatment systems capable of promoting total phosphorus (TP) removal, such as sequencing batch reactors (SBRs), are promising in this regard. Two lab-scale SBRs with different sludge retention times (SRTs) were assessed for their EE2 and TP removal rates. Anaerobic/aerobic/anoxic phases with cycles of 6 h were used to treat sewage containing EE2 at a concentration of 5 μg L-1. The removal rates of chemical oxygen demand and TP were approximately 80% for both the SBRs. Partial nitrification was observed in the SBRs. Initially, concentrations of EE2 above 1.0 μg L-1 in the treated sewage were measured. These concentrations were smaller in SBR 1, which used lower SRTs; EE2 was removed by sludge sorption. After the 56th cycle, the concentrations of EE2 in the treated sewage were below 0.1 μg L-1 in both the SBRs, indicating that its removal may have occurred by biodegradation due to acclimation to the process. Therefore, both TP removal and nitrification seem to play an important role in EE2 removal by SBRs.

Keywords: A2O SBR, EE2 and TP removal, sewage treatments.


Published
31/05/2023
Issue
Vol. 18 (2023)
Section
Papers

Authors maintain the copyrights for their work. However, they grant rights of first publication to Ambiente e Agua - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Science. In compensation, the journal can transfer the copyrights, allowing non-commercial use of the article including the right of sending the article to other data bases or publication media. The journal uses the CC BY 4.0 license"