Performance of sewage treatment plant with septic tank, anaerobic filter and constructed wetland with Typha spp

  • Paulo Fortes Neto Departamento de Ciências Agrárias. Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU), Est. Mun. Dr. José Luiz Cembranelli, n° 5000, CEP: 12081-010, Taubaté, SP, Brazil.
  • Nara Lucia Perondi Fortes Departamento de Ciências Agrárias. Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU), Est. Mun. Dr. José Luiz Cembranelli, n° 5000, CEP: 12081-010, Taubaté, SP, Brazil.
  • Elizabeth da Costa Neves Fernandes de Almeida Duarte Instituto Superior de Agronomia (ISA). Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Rita do Amaral Fragoso Instituto Superior de Agronomia (ISA). Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Ana Catarina Marcos Henriques Instituto Superior de Agronomia (ISA). Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Sofia Helena Lewis Lopes Instituto Superior de Agronomia (ISA). Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Luiza Fernanda dos Santos Pereira Departamento de Ciências Agrárias. Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU), Est. Mun. Dr. José Luiz Cembranelli, n° 5000, CEP: 12081-010, Taubaté, SP, Brazil.
Keywords: constructed wetland, macrophytes, nutrient removal

Abstract

  

The study reports the performance of a sanitary effluent treatment constituted by a septic tank, anaerobic filter and constructed wetland. The study monitored nutrient’s, carbonaceous material’s and thermotolerant coliform’s (CT) removal efficiency during 12 months. The treatment system included a septic tank, an anaerobic filter and a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland cultivated with Typha spp. Effluent samples were monthly collected before and after the septic tank, anaerobic filter and wetland. The removal efficiency for N-NH+4 was 37.6%, 66.3% for total P, 37% for COD, 54% for BOD and 99.4% for CT. The anaerobic filter and wetland were more efficient than the septic tank. P-total reduction was higher in the constructed wetland than in the anaerobic filter. Climatic conditions influenced the evaluated constituent’s removal being the highest values during hot months.


Author Biographies

Paulo Fortes Neto, Departamento de Ciências Agrárias. Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU), Est. Mun. Dr. José Luiz Cembranelli, n° 5000, CEP: 12081-010, Taubaté, SP, Brazil.
         
Nara Lucia Perondi Fortes, Departamento de Ciências Agrárias. Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU), Est. Mun. Dr. José Luiz Cembranelli, n° 5000, CEP: 12081-010, Taubaté, SP, Brazil.
        
Elizabeth da Costa Neves Fernandes de Almeida Duarte, Instituto Superior de Agronomia (ISA). Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), Lisboa, Portugal.
       
Rita do Amaral Fragoso, Instituto Superior de Agronomia (ISA). Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), Lisboa, Portugal.
      
Ana Catarina Marcos Henriques, Instituto Superior de Agronomia (ISA). Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), Lisboa, Portugal.
     
Sofia Helena Lewis Lopes, Instituto Superior de Agronomia (ISA). Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), Lisboa, Portugal.
    
Luiza Fernanda dos Santos Pereira, Departamento de Ciências Agrárias. Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU), Est. Mun. Dr. José Luiz Cembranelli, n° 5000, CEP: 12081-010, Taubaté, SP, Brazil.
   
Published
26/12/2019
Section
Special